Teclast F5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemTeclast F5  (all builds)
MotherboardTECLAST F5
Memory5.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '21 at 23:03
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N4100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 28.4
1-Core 26.2
2-Core 50
22% 34.9 Pts
4-Core 97.5
8-Core 105
14% 101 Pts
64-Core 105
7% 105 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5017
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.92% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.6 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.1
2% 3.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.92%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GMTS430S 512GB
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02J0T6O1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 258 200 205 210 215 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 392
Write 359
Mixed 333
SusWrite 240
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 20
71% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 38.4
DQ Mixed 81.7
70% 107 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
22.6% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 264
15% 264 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical F5 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Teclast F5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $299Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback