bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DCP847SKE
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 10 '21 at 13:25
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847E
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 26.2
2-Core 39.6
33% 44.5 Pts
4-Core 39.2
8-Core 36.9
5% 38.1 Pts
64-Core 46.9
3% 46.9 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Intel(8086 2044) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GB-$100
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 117 104 123 132 120 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.4% Poor
Read 180
Write 165
Mixed 190
SusWrite 120
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 10.5
33% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 96.7
DQ Write 56.2
DQ Mixed 116
76% 89.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 81%
Hitachi HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
284GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 15 16 19 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 21.8
Write 22.1
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 17.5
15% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 59%
VendorCo Disk 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 7.6 8 6.4 8.2 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 5.7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 6.4
10% 8.33 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
10% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 0.7
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback