| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 18.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200727 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 09 '21 at 20:07 |
| Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.6%
Excellent
|
87% 162 Pts
|
81% 665 Pts
|
62% 1,008 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 590-$200
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.5%
Above average
|
54% 76.6 fps
|
52% 64.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 31 33 3.5 51 31 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
32% 148 MB/s
|
53% 19.2 MB/s
|
34% 55.8 MB/s
|
|
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB
136GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 419 426 423 426 410 MB/s
|
117%
Outstanding
|
102% 455 MB/s
|
178% 64.2 MB/s
|
235% 334 MB/s
|
|
|
78% 105 MB/s
|
166% 1.2 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
64.8%
Good
|
66% 23.2 GB/s
|
58% 20.3 GB/s
|
39% 104 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 179 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 27x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 24x |
| Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 11x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $257 |