ADD TO PC
BUILD

Medion ERAZER X15805 MD61475

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Medion ERAZER X15805 MD61475 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION GK5Cx
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '21 at 22:30
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-8950HK 14,729 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Memory 83.1 1-Core 141 2-Core 288 92% 171 Pts	4-Core 550 8-Core 892 88% 721 Pts	64-Core 1,096 68% 1,096 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q) 10,818 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Device(1D05 105E) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6172 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.2% Excellent	Lighting 99.8 Reflection 102 Parallax 112 81% 105 fps	MRender 142 Gravity 96.7 Splatting 88.8 87% 109 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 441GB free (System drive) Firmware: 301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1764 856 610 608 611 609 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	267% Outstanding	Read 2,332 Write 1,895 Mixed 1,474 SusWrite 843 365% 1,636 MB/s	4K Read 50.5 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 68.7 224% 77 MB/s	DQ Read 1,269 DQ Write 1,075 DQ Mixed 1,170 877% 1,171 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 267% Great: 296%
Samsung MZ7LM1T9HMJP-00005 2TB 232 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 1TB free Firmware: GXT5104Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 434 435 426 422 436 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Read 418 Write 395 Mixed 304 SusWrite 428 87% 386 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 88.7 4K Mixed 34.7 122% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 339 257% 347 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.7 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 23.4 84% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 25.3 77% 26.8 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback