Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 81FV (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200615
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '21 at 15:19
Run Duration	349 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 124 2-Core 244 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 547 56% 452 Pts	64-Core 556 34% 556 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 86%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Legend(17AA 39FD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.6% Poor	Lighting 37.9 Reflection 37.3 Parallax 35.8 31% 37 fps	MRender 36.4 Gravity 39.4 Splatting 26.4 27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 31%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7637 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.05% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 8.1 Parallax 7.6 5% 7.4 fps	MRender 9.8 Gravity 6.7 Splatting 10.5 8% 9 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.05% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
External M.2 NVME 256GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 216GB free Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 369 373 341 313 314 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 190 Write 364 Mixed 233 SusWrite 333 64% 280 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 35.9 4K Mixed 32.3 107% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 176 124% 155 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 100%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 147GB free Firmware: 0301 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	13.5% Very poor	Read 37.3 Write 39.9 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 14.7 7% 32.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.7 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 10.5 33% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 12.4 DQ Write 17 DQ Mixed 13.6 11% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 86%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 616GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1394 1164 1130 1148 1145 1127 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	291% Outstanding	Read 2,382 Write 2,138 Mixed 1,292 SusWrite 1,185 391% 1,749 MB/s	4K Read 56.1 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 75.6 250% 86.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1145 DQ Write 918 DQ Mixed 1037 775% 1,033 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 291% Great: 372%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 533GB free Firmware: LXM3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 134 131 134 138 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 95 Write 111 Mixed 64.1 SusWrite 135 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0 52% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 95%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 33.3 Write 40.3 Mixed 33.6 SusWrite 14.3 23% 30.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.3 116% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 67%
Asmt USB3.0 500GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 105GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.58% Terrible	Read 24.7 Write 30.5 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 4.5 16% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.58% Great: 68%
Asmt USB3.0 640GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 248GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.6 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.9% Very poor	Read 33 Write 37.8 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 4.5 19% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 51%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB 16,483 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 630GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8.3 8.4 8.6 8.6 9.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 35.3 Write 35.1 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 8.5 35% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 44%
Samsung M2 Portable 500GB 459 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 215GB free, PID 60b3 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.3 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 22.9 Mixed 22.6 SusWrite 8.3 28% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 21%
ASMedia USB 3.0 Device 1TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 641GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.5 8.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 35 Write 35.2 Mixed 29.6 SusWrite 8.4 35% 27 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 130% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 105%
ASMedia USB 3.0 Device 1TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 720GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 7.6 5.9 8.1 8.3 8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 33.9 Mixed 27.2 SusWrite 7.7 33% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 105%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 393GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 30.3 Mixed 26.4 SusWrite 13.5 34% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB 28,425 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.6% Good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 21.5 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 22.4 SC Mixed 21.5 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,055 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,150x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,905x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,081x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	1,056x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	918x

SSD
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GBBench 68%, 9,061 samples	386x
TOSHIBA 128GBKbg30zmt128gBench 83%, 5,624 samples	263x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 180%, 5,016 samples	182x

RAM
RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 6,442 samples	579x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	407x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	294x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16