Asus A55BM-A/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus A55BM-A/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20151215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '21 at 11:05
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka) 11,026 User benchmarks, average bench 45% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Memory 70.2 1-Core 45.7 2-Core 120 47% 78.7 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 186 23% 178 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 239 239 239 239 239 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66% Good	Read 255 Write 239 Mixed 213 SusWrite 239 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 32 110% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 109 96% 144 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 110%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 368GB free Firmware: SC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 149 149 148 148 149 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 98.2 Write 86.1 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 148 73% 99.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 100%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 626GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 101 101 105 105 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 98.7 Write 101 Mixed 69.9 SusWrite 103 69% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 1.2 298% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 308GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 96 98 100 101 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 48.7 Write 87.4 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 95.9 53% 72.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.4 185% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	34.4% Below average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 13.7 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9.9 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A55BM-A/USB3 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A55BM-A/USB3

CPU
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	9x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	6x
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
R7 265AMD $105Bench 20%, 8,934 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x

SSD
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	3x
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	2x
Force LS 120GBCorsair $98Bench 54%, 9,315 samples	2x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	17x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	10x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16