Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1820-$56 4,011 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 90.1 1-Core 78.1 2-Core 155 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 155 21% 155 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Zotac(19DA 1044) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.99% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 0.7 1% 1.2 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.99% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721680PLA380 80GB-$41 2,269 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: P21O SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 56 55 35 20 1.7 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 64 Write 53.8 Mixed 39.8 SusWrite 33.5 35% 47.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GB 2,491 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	29% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.2 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 9 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	81x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	78x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	72x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	27x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	16x
99U5584-005.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 4,897 samples	15x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $237

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16