Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712DA_D712DA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712DA_D712DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X712DA
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200331
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 01 '21 at 19:10
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Memory 27.6
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 125
39% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 398
38% 313 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1BC1) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 3.7
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X6512G 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 230 97 99 100 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 8GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
25.4% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 13.2
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 269
15% 269 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712DA_D712DA Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712DA_D712DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback