Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Memory 24.2 1-Core 37.2 2-Core 67.7 24% 43 Pts	4-Core 97.7 8-Core 120 14% 109 Pts	64-Core 116 7% 116 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 5A85) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.16% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.2 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 0.2 1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.16% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Drevo X1 SSD 120GB 1,961 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1204B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 246 23 24 31 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	23.6% Poor	Read 301 Write 264 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 63.8 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 0.8 21% 6.77 MB/s	DQ Read 75.8 DQ Write 16.6 DQ Mixed 15.1 19% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde 1x8GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.33 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.1 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 291 14% 291 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	18x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	14x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	3x
R7 260XAMD $120Bench 20%, 38,521 samples	1x

SSD
GOODRAM 240GBBench 79%, 8,481 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
Blast 120GBPatriotBench 74%, 4,348 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5428-068.A00LF 12GBSamsungBench 26%, 4 samples	3x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	1x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16