Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200107
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '21 at 10:54
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X-$150 15,293 User benchmarks, average bench 80% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Memory 81.7 1-Core 154 2-Core 299 96% 178 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 750 81% 644 Pts	64-Core 751 46% 751 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86B9) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.4% Average	Lighting 56.3 Reflection 57.2 Parallax 49.7 46% 54.4 fps	MRender 43.1 Gravity 51.5 Splatting 46.9 39% 47.2 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA250CM10003 250GB 1,877 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: STRSD013 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 516 Write 500 Mixed 478 111% 498 MB/s	4K Read 46.6 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 65.4 225% 82 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 128 162% 289 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 830GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 194 194 196 194 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 186 Mixed 78.7 SusWrite 193 120% 164 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 113%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 753GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 111 111 111 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 88.7 Write 124 Mixed 96.7 SusWrite 109 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.7 179% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X4GD3000C16K2 2x4GB 406 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	87.9% Excellent	MC Read 37.3 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 34.1 90% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 27.7 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 34.6 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,463x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,306x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,006x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	949x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	735x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	653x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	716x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	340x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	284x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $352

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16