Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DAP_M509DA

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DAP_M509DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509DAP
Memory	1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200108
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '21 at 04:42
Run Duration	354 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics 10,258 User benchmarks, average bench 38% FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	28.5% Poor	Memory 34.9 1-Core 53.3 2-Core 89.4 34% 59.2 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 173 18% 147 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 17,211 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1B6F) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	3.96% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 5.7 Parallax 5.8 3% 5.07 fps	MRender 7.1 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 9.1 6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.96% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 180,890 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 875GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 703 957 810 829 829 833 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	184% Outstanding	Read 1,223 Write 1178 Mixed 1,073 SusWrite 827 242% 1,075 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 97.7 4K Mixed 59.2 191% 66.3 MB/s	DQ Read 785 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 498 385% 538 MB/s
Poor: 164% ↑ This bench: 184% Great: 276%
Hitachi HTS 545050A7E380 500GB 1,406 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 98GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9 9.5 9.2 9.1 9.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 37 Write 34.6 Mixed 31.6 SusWrite 9.4 21% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 57%
Seagate ST2000LM 007-1R8174 2TB 725 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.4 9.1 8.9 8.9 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 37 Mixed 33.1 SusWrite 10.2 21% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.1 110% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 70%
Samsung HD105SI 1TB 5,813 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 547GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.8 9.5 9.3 9 9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 27 Mixed 26.6 SusWrite 9.4 18% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 60%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB 3,232 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 129 128 128 129 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 118 Write 120 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 128 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 207% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 70%
SDHC Card 16GB 8,111 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 11GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 2.9 3.1 3 2.9 3.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	5.89% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 11 Mixed 12 SusWrite 3 14% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 52% 2 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.89% Great: 24%
General UDisk 64GB 461 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 27GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 12.7 Mixed 8.5 11% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 29% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 11%
General UDisk 64GB 461 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 54GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.9 3.4 3.2 4.2 4.8 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	5.7% Terrible	Read 19.6 Write 5 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 4 14% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 31% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.7% Great: 11%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 12GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 26.6 Mixed 7 14% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
General UDisk 64GB 461 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 40GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 5.1 4.3 4.9 5.3 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	5.89% Terrible	Read 19.2 Write 11.3 Mixed 19 SusWrite 4.7 17% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 33% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.89% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB 54,777 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.4% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 22.8 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 11.8 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 228 18% 228 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DAP_M509DA Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DAP_M509DA

CPU
Ryzen 3 3250U GraphicsAMDBench 38%, 10,258 samples	60x
Athlon Silver 3050U GraphicsAMDBench 35%, 5,719 samples	35x
Athlon Gold 3150U GraphicsAMDBench 45%, 2,359 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 17,211 samples	87x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	10x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	1x

SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	21x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	10x
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	4x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	37x
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	21x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16