Gigabyte Z370P D3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370P D3
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370P D3 (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171109
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '21 at 17:02
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 95 1-Core 75.6 2-Core 139 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 237 31% 231 Pts	64-Core 221 14% 221 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.8% Poor	Lighting 37.7 Reflection 41.8 Parallax 38.8 31% 39.4 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 39.2 Splatting 28 28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB 32,020 User benchmarks, average bench 230% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,233 Write 2,231 Mixed 1,374 364% 1,613 MB/s	4K Read 44.9 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 73.1 228% 80.8 MB/s	DQ Read 764 DQ Write 374 DQ Mixed 526 402% 555 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 298%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 254GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 123 124 125 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 130 Write 116 Mixed 85.2 SusWrite 123 84% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 109%
Generic External 250GB 238 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 101GB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 29 Mixed 29 SusWrite 34.3 43% 31.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$63 346,786 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	86.7% Excellent	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 30.3 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 21.8 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 57.2 70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370P D3-CF Builds (Compare 7,241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 48%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370P D3 - $190

CPU
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	1,303x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	1,299x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,265x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	754x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	520x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	507x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	237x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	226x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	182x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	341x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	215x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	142x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $602

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16