Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 157% UFO	Desktop 109% UFO	Workstation 186% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 21 '21 at 09:09
Run Duration	399 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416 33,026 User benchmarks, average bench 100% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 94.8 1-Core 165 2-Core 329 106% 196 Pts	4-Core 604 8-Core 1,137 104% 870 Pts	64-Core 2,797 173% 2,797 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8667) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	151% Outstanding	Lighting 200 Reflection 196 Parallax 221 163% 206 fps	MRender 242 Gravity 208 Splatting 170 165% 206 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB (2019)-$300 4,259 User benchmarks, average bench 263% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 102430WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2118 1905 1329 1326 1330 1325 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	282% Outstanding	Read 1,885 Write 2,239 Mixed 1,758 SusWrite 1,556 420% 1,859 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 181 4K Mixed 63.5 237% 94.6 MB/s	DQ Read 904 DQ Write 865 DQ Mixed 950 695% 906 MB/s
Poor: 183% ↑ This bench: 282% Great: 320%
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB 13,468 User benchmarks, average bench 437% 734GB free Firmware: 611110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 2361 2470 2382 1442 1475 998 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	395% Outstanding	Read 3,016 Write 2,462 Mixed 2,497 SusWrite 1,854 551% 2,457 MB/s	4K Read 72.2 4K Write 186 4K Mixed 91.9 326% 117 MB/s	DQ Read 1,672 DQ Write 1,055 DQ Mixed 1,227 952% 1,318 MB/s
Poor: 280% ↑ This bench: 395% Great: 578%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160 8,291 User benchmarks, average bench 359% 918GB free Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3657 3855 3838 3828 3846 3841 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	453% Outstanding	Read 2,156 Write 3527 Mixed 2,238 SusWrite 3,811 667% 2933 MB/s	4K Read 47.8 4K Write 169 4K Mixed 80.9 265% 99.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,444 DQ Write 892 DQ Mixed 1,103 839% 1,146 MB/s
Poor: 207% ↑ This bench: 453% Great: 500%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 954GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 455 456 456 456 456 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 443 Mixed 395 SusWrite 455 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 46.6 159% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 200 151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 931GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 455 454 454 456 455 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 446 Mixed 448 SusWrite 454 104% 461 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 53 174% 60.3 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 199 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 931GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 451 443 448 453 436 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 196 Mixed 261 SusWrite 443 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 41.8 4K Write 86.2 4K Mixed 52.1 176% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 170 136% 191 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 126%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 1,438 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 962GB free, PID d010 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 110 113 113 116 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 98.8 Write 82 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 113 105% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMT32GX4M4K4000C19 4x8GB 227 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	MC Read 61.3 MC Write 45.9 MC Mixed 46.3 146% 51.2 GB/s	SC Read 33 SC Write 29.1 SC Mixed 45.1 102% 35.7 GB/s	Latency 57.7 69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS XTREME Builds (Compare 657 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 207%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 248%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME

CPU
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	306x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	130x
Ryzen 9 3950XAMD $515Bench 89%, 50,170 samples	87x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	158x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	72x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	69x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	69x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	37x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	21x
F4-3600C18-32GTZN 4x31.8GBG.SKILLBench 118%, 777 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $1,670

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16