ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-7252

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	MSI MS-7252 (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20081025
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '21 at 21:53
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ 5,400 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Memory 78.3 1-Core 37.9 2-Core 76.9 43% 64.4 Pts	4-Core 76.8 8-Core 76.5 10% 76.7 Pts	64-Core 76.8 5% 76.8 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 34CD) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.45% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 0.2 0% 0.97 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 0.5 0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.45% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST380819AS 80GB-$89 852 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 8.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 40 27 22 24 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Read 44.5 Write 45.8 Mixed 33 SusWrite 27.2 28% 37.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 32%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 3GB free Firmware: 03.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 33 33 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 32.5 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 32.5 23% 31 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 35%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 92GB free Firmware: 02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 52 51 51 52 50 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 52 Write 51.6 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 50.8 36% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 35%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 466GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 96 98 99 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 121 Write 98.3 Mixed 57.9 SusWrite 97.5 69% 93.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	19.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.5 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 83.7 48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback