PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A55-DS3 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130522 |
Uptime | 3.4 Days |
Run Date | Feb 14 '21 at 17:30 |
Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
41%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 265-$105
CLim: 955 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.12.1
|
19.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 96 98 97 92 MB/s
|
32.6%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 92 96 98 97 92 MB/s
|
68.2%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
20.8%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 6x |
Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)AMD $59Bench 51%, 6,408 samples | 5x |
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 3x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 2x |
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $390 |