MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '21 at 20:42
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$154
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 162
2-Core 312
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 901
88% 723 Pts
64-Core 1138
70% 1138 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (163 fps cap detected)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 163
Parallax 163
133% 163 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 163
Splatting 162
133% 163 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 126%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,987
Write 3,336
Mixed 2,609
666% 2,977 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 71.7
270% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,268
DQ Write 1,117
DQ Mixed 1,116
858% 1,167 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
Crucial M550 128GB-$40
119GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 356 356 355 355 353 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 355
Mixed 315
SusWrite 355
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 43.4
163% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 224
199% 298 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
355GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,332
Write 6,904
Mixed 8,237
1,884% 8,491 MB/s
4K Read 677
4K Write 452
4K Mixed 373
1,743% 501 MB/s
DQ Read 1,746
DQ Write 1,342
DQ Mixed 1,418
1,095% 1,502 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
336GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 79 85 81 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 77.7
Write 77.4
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 80.8
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
529GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 167 169 173 172 170 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
570GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 166 167 152 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 83.2
Write 35.6
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 163
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D30BESB.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 34.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 29.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $834
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback