Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-DS2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF (all builds)
Memory	20 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '21 at 15:59
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 73.6 1-Core 100 2-Core 189 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 656 63% 518 Pts	64-Core 850 53% 850 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.9% Poor	Lighting 36.4 Reflection 40.5 Parallax 37.9 30% 38.3 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 27.1 28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 455 Write 425 Mixed 86.3 71% 322 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 58.5 4K Mixed 29 102% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 299 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 132 136% 222 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB 40,989 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 55GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 87 89 88 89 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 91.2 Write 79.7 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 85.8 51% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 61%
WD WD2004FBYZ-01YCBB0 2TB 1,248 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 64GB free Firmware: RR03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 116 118 119 120 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 102 Write 196 Mixed 106 SusWrite 119 97% 131 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1.1 339% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 109 163 163 165 164 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 164 Write 69.8 Mixed 70 SusWrite 142 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 109%
Multi-Reader -1 64GB 547 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 42GB free, PID 6368 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 10 10 10 8.7 7.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 90.7 Write 39.5 Mixed 32 SusWrite 9.3 48% 42.9 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 7.5 552% 9.53 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 70%
Multi-Reader -3 32GB 144 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 5GB free, PID 6368 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 11 11 11 9 7.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.81% Terrible	Read 44.3 Write 7.5 Mixed 10 SusWrite 9.6 18% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.81% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C15/16G KHX2400C15/8G 24GB 171 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	82.5% Excellent	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 28.1 85% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 31.2 SC Mixed 23.8 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 93.4 43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	33x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	25x
Ryzen 5 1500XAMD $131Bench 66%, 70,038 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	13x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	12x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	8x
Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 37%, 8,300 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $188

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16