Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '21 at 14:06
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 87.7
1-Core 155
2-Core 301
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 1,150
103% 870 Pts
64-Core 1,657
102% 1,657 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan Black-$1,000
EVGA(3842 3798) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.4% Below average
Lighting 55
Reflection 45.7
Parallax 32.4
45% 44.4 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 25.6
20% 24.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1373 1284 1277 1209 1185 1158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,640
Write 1,571
Mixed 1,383
SusWrite 1,248
329% 1,461 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 45
142% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,237
DQ Write 1,038
DQ Mixed 1,138
852% 1,138 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 237%
Great: 410%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 78 80 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 90
Write 94.3
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 78.6
62% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 100%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
402GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 82 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 93.1
Write 95.8
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 84
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51%
Great: 99%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 167 166 169 169 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 108
Write 115
Mixed 67
SusWrite 168
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 100%
Amd-raid WDC WD6003FFBX-6 6TB
412GB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 132 138 136 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 115
Write 118
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 136
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.6
334% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 146%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$280
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 178 172 177 175 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 182
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 175
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.7
339% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 138%
Sony QD-G128E 124GB
46GB free, PID 087c
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 153 151 152 146 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 280
Write 60.9
Mixed 88
SusWrite 148
166% 144 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 4
248% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 101%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
15GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 14 22 37 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 88.4
Write 14
Mixed 10.1
SusWrite 23.3
34% 34 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.5
91% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.2% Very good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 22
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 24.5
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming X Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $946
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback