Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Memory 76.4 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 149 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 400 41% 330 Pts	64-Core 423 26% 423 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	8.48% Terrible	Lighting 8.5 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 18.2 7% 14.7 fps	MRender 20.1 Gravity 12.9 Splatting 10.8 12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 8.48% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OSSD512GBTSS2 512GB 213 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7B0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 239 Write 203 Mixed 166 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 17.4 74% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 37 57% 107 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 91%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB 3,748 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 3.5TB free Firmware: GA06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 176 176 178 179 180 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 168 Mixed 83 SusWrite 177 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.1 246% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT125R7TFR8C 8x2GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 8 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	72.1% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 27.6 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 10.1 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 87.5 46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 75%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16