Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 870K 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 46% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Memory 48.4 1-Core 50 2-Core 96.2 38% 64.9 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 155 20% 151 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 35.5 Reflection 39.5 Parallax 36.4 29% 37.1 fps	Splatting 26.3 27% 26.3 fps
Poor: 27% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3Z4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 83 77 90 45 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 314 Write 159 Mixed 246 SusWrite 67.8 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 12.1 62% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 40.9 71% 136 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 577GB free Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 157 158 132 161 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 163 Mixed 40.4 SusWrite 155 94% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF 2x8GB 845 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	27.2% Poor	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 11.5 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.8 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	59x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	51x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	40x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16