BOXX W8450SE

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	BOXX W8450SE (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel D5400XS
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090724
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '17 at 20:02
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	73%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 8 User benchmarks, average bench 50% J6PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Memory 40.7 1-Core 37.9 2-Core 76.9 31% 51.8 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 133 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti (448 Core LE) 2,165 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Asus(1043 83D6) 1.2GB CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Lighting 21.3 Reflection 34.8 Parallax 25.1 17% 27 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 18 Splatting 25.7 22% 27.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70 10,510 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1114H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 414 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 663 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 44 (A3) Unknown 100 100 25 (A4) Unknown 100 100 33998 (A5) Unknown 100 100 97 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 33 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 99 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 57 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 18167 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 9 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 71719 (F2) Unknown 100 100 86766 (F5) Unknown 100 100 135992	35.1% Below average	Read 253 Write 154 Mixed 192 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 11.4 50% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 10.9 DQ Write 14.5 DQ Mixed 7.63 7% 11 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 90%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 1TB 4,641 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 714GB free Firmware: 0108 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 96.6 Write 71.1 Mixed 62.9 57% 76.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.13 4K Write 0.22 4K Mixed 0.07 17% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 63%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 116GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 126573120 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1070 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 2496737 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1417 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 900 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 60 521601055 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 141 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6188 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 55834574879 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -35549444307789 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4353037907 (F2) Unknown 100 253 9083787177	70.1% Very good	Read 108 Write 135 Mixed 91.6 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 5.33 4K Mixed 0.57 193% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 108%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 55GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 55.4 Write 64.3 Mixed 46.5 72% 55.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 3.35 4K Mixed 0.37 127% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	9.41% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 2.8 9% 3 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.4 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 9.41% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16