Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9370-$194 9,054 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Memory 77.5 1-Core 56.2 2-Core 103 50% 78.9 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 226 26% 203 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 957 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.2% Average	Lighting 58.5 Reflection 64.8 Parallax 77.9 48% 67.1 fps	MRender 57.1 Gravity 53.7 Splatting 41.1 40% 50.6 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 148 152 146 150 151 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 356 Write 369 Mixed 322 SusWrite 170 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 43.9 4K Mixed 29.6 97% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 36.9 DQ Write 83.4 DQ Mixed 47.3 40% 55.9 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 115%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 300GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 153 145 163 198 196 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 317 Write 169 Mixed 173 SusWrite 172 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 46.7 4K Mixed 19.5 77% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 32.3 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 44.3 40% 59.4 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 129%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 150 149 149 152 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 160 Write 146 Mixed 101 SusWrite 149 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1866C10-8GAB CT102464BD160B.C16 F3-1866C10-8GAB CT102464BD160B.C16 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.3% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.3 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

SSD
1TB 1TBKingchuxingBench 129%, 251 samples	3x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	2x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	2x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $260

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16