PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus A88XM-A (all builds) |
Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140120 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 01 '21 at 19:44 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | LTU-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD PRO A10-8750B R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
|
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 550-$79
XFX(1682 9550) 2GB
CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
|
15.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 400 404 404 424 424 MB/s
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
|||
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB
127GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 197 196 197 196 195 MB/s
|
74%
Very good
|
|||
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
32GB free
Firmware: 10.02E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 57 58 58 MB/s
|
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905403-447.A00LF 1333EL Series 9905403-447.A00LF 1333EL Series 16GB
1066, 1066, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
28%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 53x |
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 39x |
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 31x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 31x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $178 |