| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | ECS P4M900T-M2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20070913 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 01 '21 at 10:10 |
| Run Duration | 255 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron 420
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
|
39.2%
Below average
|
30% 35.5 Pts
|
2% 14.7 Pts
|
1% 13.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
|
1.45%
Terrible
|
2% 1.63 fps
|
1% 1.67 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 20 40 30 34 36 MB/s
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
23% 31.7 MB/s
|
106% 0.67 MB/s
| |
|
|
47% 62.7 MB/s
|
128% 0.93 MB/s
| ||
|
USB Flash Disk 32GB
21GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 6 3.6 3 4.2 4.2 MB/s
|
3.87%
Terrible
|
8% 7.77 MB/s
|
8% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
10.3%
Very poor
|
8% 2.67 GB/s
|
5% 1.63 GB/s
|
46% 86.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P4M900T-M2 Builds (Compare 11 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: ECS P4M900T-M2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Pentium Dual E2200Intel $54Bench 33%, 8,325 samples | 3x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 2x |
| Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $54 |