Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	10.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-3300 APU-$90 2,884 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Memory 41.2 1-Core 26.3 2-Core 54.7 26% 40.7 Pts	4-Core 42.1 8-Core 46.8 6% 44.4 Pts	64-Core 74.3 5% 74.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 2% AMD(1002 9645) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.881.0.0 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	1.44% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 1.4 1% 2.27 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.44% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Colorful SL300 128GB 1,103 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0224B SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 47 66 65 77 79 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.8% Very poor	Read 104 Write 122 Mixed 109 SusWrite 62.7 22% 99.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 2.2 9% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 90%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 358GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 53 83 79 93 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 97.2 Write 76.3 Mixed 53.3 SusWrite 76.5 56% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Tigo-1600Mhz-4G Kingston 99P5471-002.A01LF 6GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 8.7 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.9 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16