PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 53.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191209 |
Uptime | 1.7 Days |
Run Date | Jan 30 '21 at 13:06 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
84.7%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 875D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
105%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 402 389 250 398 403 MB/s
|
82.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate ST500VT000-1DK142 500GB
140GB free
Firmware: 0001SDC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 59 58 59 59 59 MB/s
|
38.4%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
194GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 122 108 92 119 101 MB/s
|
57.7%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
69.7%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $103Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 4,987x |
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 3,167x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $210Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 2,932x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 1,505x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $442Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 1,308x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 1,295x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $697 |