Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9800 APU (2016 M.BR) 4,241 User benchmarks, average bench 44% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Memory 68.4 1-Core 74.8 2-Core 113 52% 85.3 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 241 32% 241 Pts	64-Core 235 14% 235 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85F7) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.67% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 5 Parallax 4.9 4% 4.8 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 4 Splatting 4.2 4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.67% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 73GB free Firmware: UF4004RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 155 148 140 135 135 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 390 Write 232 Mixed 275 SusWrite 159 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 14.5 70% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 57.9 DQ Mixed 12.7 30% 63.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 56%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 771GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 85 133 86 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 43.3 Write 166 Mixed 44.4 SusWrite 112 67% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB M378A5143DB0-CPB 12GB 119 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.1% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 9.6 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 8 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16