Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 168%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics213% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive298% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory121.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '21 at 03:54
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 64.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 289
88% 167 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 825
82% 671 Pts
64-Core 1,063
66% 1,063 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
213% Outstanding
Lighting 320
Reflection 298
Parallax 355
261% 324 fps
MRender 341
Gravity 258
Splatting 180
204% 260 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 213%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
2GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 503
Write 446
Mixed 445
104% 465 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 59.3
196% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 203
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1346 964 946 939 915 894 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,481
Write 2,265
Mixed 1,655
SusWrite 1,001
414% 1,850 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 84.6
281% 99.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,229
DQ Write 1,050
DQ Mixed 1,137
853% 1,139 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 298%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
272GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 431 440 453 455 371 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 446
Mixed 429
SusWrite 428
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 59.1
195% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 203
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 116%
Great: 129%
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
615GB free
Firmware: S0118C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1110 989 1352 1212 1381 1557 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,438
Write 1,528
Mixed 1,351
SusWrite 1,267
367% 1,646 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 87.7
296% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,398
DQ Write 949
DQ Mixed 512
561% 953 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 319%
Great: 373%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
279GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 448 448 448 448 360 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 445
Mixed 430
SusWrite 432
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 58.6
190% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 203
153% 204 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.7% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 26.9
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,613
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback