PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell OptiPlex 3010 |
Motherboard | Dell OptiPlex 3010 (all builds) |
Memory | 0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130606 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 25 '21 at 17:10 |
Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 79% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-3245
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
54.5%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8650) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 43 44 46 46 55 MB/s
|
31.4%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 26 26 25 MB/s
|
15.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Kingston ACR16D3LU1MNG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
38.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 2,025x |
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 549x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 347x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 1,055x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 298x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 262x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |