Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130 10,423 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 87.9 2-Core 159 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 428 43% 351 Pts	64-Core 426 26% 426 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 0494) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.63% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.33 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 0.9 1% 1.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.63% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 275 271 274 245 157 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 438 Write 385 Mixed 212 SusWrite 255 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 21.3 70% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 220 196% 297 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB 6,386 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	49.2% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 15.4 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	715x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	298x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	96x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	54x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	41x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 46%, 268 samples	39x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16