Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B61
Motherboard	MSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61) (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200608
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '21 at 12:35
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$139 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 82.3 1-Core 132 2-Core 263 87% 159 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 746 79% 629 Pts	64-Core 587 36% 587 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C303) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	86.4% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 119 Parallax 108 88% 111 fps	MRender 86.7 Gravity 117 Splatting 104 84% 102 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 303 302 306 304 305 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 474 Mixed 353 SusWrite 305 91% 407 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 39 157% 59.5 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 240 209% 311 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 58GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 313 340 315 317 317 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 472 Mixed 452 SusWrite 332 99% 438 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 54.5 186% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 360 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 716GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 199 197 200 201 201 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 188 Mixed 81.2 SusWrite 199 121% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Predator 2666 C13 2x8GB-$137 7,627 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.5% Good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 20.5 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 22.3 SC Mixed 19.7 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 99%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	340x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	249x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	188x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	382x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	180x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $30Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	165x

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $637

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16