Asus PRIME X299-A II

Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 117% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X299-A II (all builds)
Memory	56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190823
Uptime	8.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '21 at 16:30
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9820X-$550 2,515 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Memory 88.7 1-Core 124 2-Core 248 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 1,009 90% 758 Pts	64-Core 1,738 108% 1,738 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Zotac(19DA 4509) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	115% Outstanding	Lighting 150 Reflection 145 Parallax 162 122% 152 fps	MRender 182 Gravity 127 Splatting 114 112% 141 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 847GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1176 1168 1152 1122 1094 1105 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	193% Outstanding	Read 1,379 Write 1,058 Mixed 920 SusWrite 1,136 252% 1,123 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 75.6 4K Mixed 46.1 169% 56 MB/s	DQ Read 626 DQ Write 96.3 DQ Mixed 190 183% 304 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 255%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB 5,027 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 147GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 409 374 368 364 361 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Read 463 Write 383 Mixed 384 SusWrite 382 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 35.2 129% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 71.8 DQ Mixed 131 120% 194 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 128%
Adata SP600 256GB 4,724 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 120GB free Firmware: 2.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 209 209 208 205 204 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 408 Write 218 Mixed 207 SusWrite 208 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 45.2 4K Mixed 25.2 94% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 62.9 DQ Mixed 115 89% 125 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 97%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 921GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 408 403 396 387 391 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 383 Mixed 380 SusWrite 400 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 33.5 126% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 62.3 DQ Mixed 116 112% 185 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 133%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 895GB free Firmware: JP4OA39C SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 114 111 113 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 74.3 Write 79.5 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 113 57% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 74%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250 11,608 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 879GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 54 53 53 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 55.2 Write 45.8 Mixed 39 SusWrite 52.7 36% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 62%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 426GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 102 102 102 100 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Read 184 Write 176 Mixed 94.5 SusWrite 102 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 224% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 8x8GB 118 User benchmarks, average bench 130% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	125% Outstanding	MC Read 46 MC Write 60.7 MC Mixed 45.2 145% 50.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 11.2 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 160%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X299-A II Builds (Compare 1,109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 177%

UFO

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 191%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-A II

CPU
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples	278x
Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples	212x
Core i9-10920XIntel $850Bench 87%, 3,007 samples	203x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	96x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	93x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	83x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	77x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	75x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	73x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	21x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 91%, 43,162 samples	14x
HyperX 2666 C16 4x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 10,297 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $1,401

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16