To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170209
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '21 at 11:00
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	78%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	30.8% Below average	Memory 34.6 1-Core 52.4 2-Core 102 35% 63.1 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 220 23% 183 Pts	64-Core 252 16% 252 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% PNY(196E 1350) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.8% Above average	Lighting 71.8 Reflection 101 Parallax 68.4 58% 80.5 fps	MRender 62.2 Gravity 68 Splatting 56.6 50% 62.3 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37 120GB 181 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0703A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 21 35 43 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Read 287 Write 177 Mixed 131 SusWrite 35.3 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 5.9 43% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 23.6 DQ Write 50.2 DQ Mixed 1.9 11% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 77%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 281GB free Firmware: CA12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 91 90 92 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 100 Write 93.8 Mixed 41.7 SusWrite 90.4 60% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F641GU67G1600G 1x8GB 416 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 229 17% 229 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	709x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	614x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	102x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16