Gigabyte GA-H410M S2H

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H410M S2H (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '21 at 00:57
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10100-$120 9,249 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 69.9 1-Core 126 2-Core 242 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 643 69% 534 Pts	64-Core 678 46% 678 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 101,303 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 4027) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.9% Average	Lighting 52 Reflection 53.5 Parallax 48.6 42% 51.4 fps	MRender 60.3 Gravity 47 Splatting 46 40% 51.1 fps
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70 317,552 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 386GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 736 969 761 610 618 615 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	211% Outstanding	Read 1,198 Write 1097 Mixed 1,002 SusWrite 718 225% 1,004 MB/s	4K Read 60.2 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 76.6 260% 89.8 MB/s	DQ Read 956 DQ Write 782 DQ Mixed 844 639% 861 MB/s
Poor: 210% ↑ This bench: 211% Great: 318%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$47 34,668 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 845GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 135 135 134 136 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	78.7% Very good	Read 141 Write 131 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 133 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.9 183% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.C4FE 1x8GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 9.6 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 10.1 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H410M S2H Builds (Compare 1,547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H410M S2H

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $143Bench 88%, 30,246 samples	423x
Core i3-10100Intel $120Bench 85%, 9,249 samples	361x
Core i3-10100FIntel $120Bench 85%, 6,616 samples	250x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 7,115 samples	172x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 210,850 samples	139x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $304Bench 60%, 79,666 samples	98x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $32Bench 66%, 251,096 samples	87x
A400 480GBKingston $53Bench 75%, 127,515 samples	66x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 218%, 49,044 samples	62x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $81Bench 81%, 97,262 samples	75x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 12,698 samples	49x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 83%, 62,260 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $256

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-10400F $143	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-10600K $230	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $326	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16