Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130206
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '21 at 19:37
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$165 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 160 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 252 32% 242 Pts	64-Core 247 15% 247 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.94% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 1.2 3% 3.2 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.94% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$25 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32070RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 60 65 70 58 61 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.4% Poor	Read 120 Write 98.7 Mixed 22.6 SusWrite 65.3 17% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 11.3 54% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 13 DQ Write 46.8 DQ Mixed 9.4 13% 23.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 86%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$23 53,598 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 118GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 68 62 61 62 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 76.3 Write 82.5 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 62.8 52% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 245GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 63 52 43 40 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 52.5 Write 41.5 Mixed 16.9 SusWrite 51.2 29% 40.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 55% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 109%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 72GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 59 58 59 59 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Read 49.9 Write 37.3 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 58.9 62% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 42%
WD Elements 2620 4TB 3,758 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 3TB free, PID 2620 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 90 59 52 56 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 42.4 Write 60 Mixed 35.1 SusWrite 65.8 72% 50.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 77,652 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.6% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 13.8 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 934 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	248x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	113x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	58x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	57x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	51x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	45x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	17x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $454

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16