Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO (all builds)
Memory	48.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '21 at 03:26
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	77%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 71.1 1-Core 123 2-Core 195 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 390 42% 335 Pts	64-Core 429 27% 429 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.1% Below average	Lighting 12.6 Reflection 109 Parallax 104 10% 75.3 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 113 Splatting 94.8 83% 103 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 253 189 179 189 161 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 286 Write 273 Mixed 222 SusWrite 205 55% 247 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 61.5 4K Mixed 37.4 117% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 358 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 911GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 947 1485 1673 1073 888 880 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	223% Outstanding	Read 1,318 Write 1,146 Mixed 1,024 SusWrite 1,157 261% 1,162 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 49.4 170% 61.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,196 DQ Write 940 DQ Mixed 990 762% 1042 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 223% Great: 372%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 334GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 92 91 91 92 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 102 Write 99.2 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 90.1 66% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 4x16GB 211 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2197 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	63.3% Good	MC Read 23.4 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 21.5 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 14.1 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 98.9 40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 149%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 105%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	3,190x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	231x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	220x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	210x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	186x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	174x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	219x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	168x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	109x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,081

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16