Asus X442URR

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus X442URR (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X442URR
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190524
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '21 at 03:09
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	24%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Memory 36.5 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 127 48% 86.2 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 346 36% 293 Pts	64-Core 381 24% 381 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 14BE) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.9% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 9.3 Parallax 7.5 5% 7.7 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 6.7 Splatting 0.2 4% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.9% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB 16,974 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 5 45 63 86 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 344 Write 251 Mixed 246 SusWrite 63.9 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 9.1 29% 8.77 MB/s	DQ Read 61.6 DQ Write 69.3 DQ Mixed 41.8 38% 57.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 55%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 461GB free Firmware: JU000J SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 99 101 101 100 103 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 133 Write 134 Mixed 55.5 SusWrite 101 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.5 208% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G3A2 029E CMSO4GX4M1A2133C15 8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2400, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 18.8 62% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 19.3 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 219 18% 219 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X442URR Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X442URR

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	257x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	1x
Core i3-7100UIntelBench 43%, 37,239 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	178x
930MXNvidiaBench 8%, 7,330 samples	80x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	10x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x

RAM
8ATF51264HZ-2G3A2 1x4GBMicronBench 40%, 788 samples	45x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Kingston 9905625-004.A03LF 16GBHynixBench 68%, 19 samples	11x
HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 1x4GBHynixBench 36%, 9,725 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16