Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu AMILO PRO V3515 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU AMILO PRO V3515
Memory	0.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070302
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '21 at 13:16
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron M 440 159 User benchmarks, average bench 25% mPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Memory 39.2 1-Core 17.4 2-Core 17.2 19% 24.6 Pts	4-Core 17.7 8-Core 17.6 2% 17.7 Pts	64-Core 17.5 1% 17.5 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
VIA Chrome9 HC IGP WDDM 1.1 Fijitsu Siemens(1734 10CB) 256MB Driver: VTGUModeDX32.dll Ver. 8.14.14.87 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0 Reflection 0.2 0% 0.1 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST980811AS 80GB-$100 1,707 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.ALB SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 35 35 36 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 8.3 Write 17 Mixed 12.8 SusWrite 28.7 12% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 82% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 24%
187 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID fafa Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 21.1 Write 6.3 Mixed 4.3 10% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x0.5GB 3,675 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 2 of 2 slots used 1GB DIMM DRAM Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	4.28% Terrible	MC Read 0.8 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 0.1 3% 1.1 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 0 2% 0.73 GB/s	Latency 206 19% 206 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.28% Great: 15%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16