Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3225-$325 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 59% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 87.9 2-Core 152 58% 101 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 222 30% 221 Pts	64-Core 219 14% 219 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15 52,547 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.97% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.6 3% 2.63 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.5 3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.97% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 363 362 363 362 362 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Read 360 Write 332 Mixed 237 SusWrite 357 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 31 114% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29.4 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 41.5 44% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 2x4GB 1,033 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 15.1 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	25x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	16x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	15x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	14x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $391

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16