Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 30% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP900X3E-A03SG
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150715
Uptime5 Days
Run DateJan 09 '21 at 04:50
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%
CPU Throttled 30%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3537U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 21.7
2-Core 38.2
28% 39 Pts
4-Core 53.6
8-Core 54.1
7% 53.8 Pts
64-Core 53.9
3% 53.9 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 2.9
3% 3.53 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.9
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD512HAGL-000 512GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT41K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 102 123 91 79 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 293
Write 169
Mixed 121
SusWrite 104
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 11.6
40% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 86.3
DQ Mixed 60.7
60% 96.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BFU0-GN-F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback