| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P5KPL-AM (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100820 |
| Uptime | 2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 07 '21 at 17:51 |
| Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 72% |
PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
|
35.8%
Below average
|
30% 42.7 Pts
|
12% 87.8 Pts
|
3% 54.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8423) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
13% 23.9 fps
|
22% 28 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 38 22 23 72 71 MB/s
|
36.6%
Below average
|
48% 65.8 MB/s
|
124% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
11.4%
Very poor
|
10% 3.6 GB/s
|
7% 2.4 GB/s
|
29% 137 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5KPL-AM Builds (Compare 121 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Pentium E5200Intel $50Bench 36%, 13,848 samples | 20x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 13x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 9x |
| GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples | 8x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $79 |