HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8437
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190522
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '21 at 22:20
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 87.6 1-Core 124 2-Core 227 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 700 68% 556 Pts	64-Core 983 61% 983 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.4% Above average	Lighting 55.9 Reflection 72.6 Parallax 78 46% 68.8 fps	MRender 76.2 Gravity 78.3 Splatting 75.5 63% 76.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB 31,797 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 14 33 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 602 Write 115 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 16.9 39% 186 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 13 4K Mixed 15.5 64% 17.7 MB/s	DQ Read 339 DQ Write 13.8 DQ Mixed 23.6 56% 126 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 147%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 107GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 98 98 97 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 165 Write 153 Mixed 90.8 SusWrite 97.9 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	69.6% Good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 22.3 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 18.1 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 2,939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	1,239x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	719x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	588x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	737x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	357x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	290x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	353x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	172x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	157x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBMicronBench 77%, 6,220 samples	395x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	220x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	179x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $366

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16