Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X (all builds)
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '21 at 18:33
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Memory 91.4 1-Core 139 2-Core 276 93% 169 Pts	4-Core 514 8-Core 734 78% 624 Pts	64-Core 760 47% 760 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.7% Above average	Lighting 67 Reflection 63.7 Parallax 99.4 55% 76.7 fps	MRender 65.2 Gravity 71.1 Splatting 48.1 49% 61.5 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 326 299 309 300 274 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 348 Mixed 283 SusWrite 306 79% 355 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 89.4 4K Mixed 39.2 141% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 265 223% 324 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 129%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$113 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 455GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 447 458 462 459 457 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 450 Mixed 417 SusWrite 454 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 89.4 4K Mixed 49.6 164% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 350 263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB 18,355 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.4% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 21.6 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 23.6 SC Mixed 21.9 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 65.1 61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 GAMING X-CF Builds (Compare 11,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $210

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,967x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	2,723x
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,632x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	933x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	868x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	768x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	452x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	443x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	345x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	481x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	400x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	335x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $756

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16