$(default_string) $(DEFAULT_STRING)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
System$(default_string) $(DEFAULT_STRING)  (all builds)
Motherboard$(DEFAULT_STRING) $(DEFAULT_STRING)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 05 '21 at 15:08
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron J4125
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 45.3
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 125
45% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 216
32% 231 Pts
64-Core 212
14% 212 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.6 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.2
2% 3.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30
163GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 157 108 105 105 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 381
Write 227
Mixed 266
SusWrite 166
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 33.9
125% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 200
173% 253 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 13.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical $(DEFAULT_STRING) Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: $(default_string) $(DEFAULT_STRING)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback