Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	70.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 01 '21 at 23:03
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 81 1-Core 93.8 2-Core 189 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 523 56% 446 Pts	64-Core 570 35% 570 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Asus(1043 869F) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.55 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.7% Very good	Lighting 91.9 Reflection 90 Parallax 83.8 75% 88.6 fps	MRender 83.6 Gravity 79.9 Splatting 69.2 63% 77.6 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF500000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 385 Write 325 Mixed 297 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 15.2 59% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 72.6 DQ Mixed 40.5 44% 73.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 845GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 411 381 393 402 395 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 432 Write 426 Mixed 386 SusWrite 398 93% 411 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 48.4 159% 54.6 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 357 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 988GB 515 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 109GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 151 172 158 159 146 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 59.3 Write 101 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 158 69% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Apacer 78.C1GS7.AUW0B 2x8GB 551 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	65.1% Good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 21.9 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 17.1 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	832x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	481x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	429x

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $438

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16