PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M LX3 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160505 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 01 '21 at 00:21 |
Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
Run User | BLR-User |
Background CPU | 67% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-4320 Quad-Core
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
|
47.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Amd-raid WDC WDS480G2G0A- 480GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 71 80 74 77 42 MB/s
|
55.3%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 77 86 77 78 53 MB/s
|
35.1%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
25%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 535x |
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 206x |
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 152x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 180x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 107x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 75x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $281 |