Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 235%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics215% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200207
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 00:50
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10920X-$850
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 88.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 295
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1,145
102% 861 Pts
64-Core 2,204
136% 2,204 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB; gigabyte
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
215% Outstanding
Lighting 320
Reflection 299
Parallax 350
261% 323 fps
MRender 350
Gravity 262
Splatting 190
210% 267 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 215%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,825
Write 1,469
Mixed 1,083
323% 1,459 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 74.6
252% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 931
DQ Write 1,260
DQ Mixed 1,006
785% 1,066 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
581GB free
Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1846 1060 1051 1021 953 1047 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,685
Write 2,279
Mixed 1,756
SusWrite 1,163
389% 1,721 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 61
198% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,378
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 246
309% 587 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 234%
Great: 303%
TS512GMTS400S 512GB
173GB free
Firmware: P1225CH1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 418 404 412 418 405 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 116 121 119 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 191
Write 144
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 118
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 278 273 276 291 284 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 12 9.2 8.8 9.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 18
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 12.9
27% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.3
214% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 55.2
MC Mixed 33.1
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 11.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $795
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback