Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3225-$325 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 59% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Memory 65.5 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 154 59% 102 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 216 29% 217 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15 52,547 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 2111) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.1% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.8 3% 2.77 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.7 3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.1% Great: 3%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 452 Write 358 Mixed 305 82% 371 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 60.3 4K Mixed 19.1 91% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 168 172% 280 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 272GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 246 Write 184 Mixed 236 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 31.3 113% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 198 149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5458-001.A00LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 99U5458-001.A00LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 20GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 15.1 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	41x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	34x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $624

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16