PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte A320M-DS2 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190116 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Dec 28 '20 at 08:46 |
Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 77% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$104
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$68
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 137 135 163 156 157 MB/s
|
54.5%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB
521GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 10 9.4 31 45 36 MB/s
|
9.6%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingmax GLLG42F-18---------- 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
24%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 33x |
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 25x |
Ryzen 5 1500XAMD $131Bench 66%, 70,038 samples | 17x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 39x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $104Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 13x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $189 |