Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 179% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 181% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	182% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '20 at 16:05
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900X-$620 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	99.3% Outstanding	Memory 84.2 1-Core 151 2-Core 303 96% 179 Pts	4-Core 611 8-Core 1,206 107% 908 Pts	64-Core 1,392 86% 1,392 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Asus(1043 87B0) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	182% Outstanding	Lighting 260 Reflection 230 Parallax 267 212% 252 fps	MRender 300 Gravity 228 Splatting 169 183% 232 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 182% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 21,747 User benchmarks, average bench 219% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXZ74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1752 Write 448 Mixed 430 189% 877 MB/s	4K Read 48.9 4K Write 166 4K Mixed 61.4 241% 92.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,476 DQ Write 480 DQ Mixed 675 577% 877 MB/s
Poor: 134% Great: 292%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 21,747 User benchmarks, average bench 219% 42GB free Firmware: CXZ74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,157 Write 1,317 Mixed 670 303% 1,381 MB/s	4K Read 51.7 4K Write 169 4K Mixed 66.7 253% 95.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,577 DQ Write 1,096 DQ Mixed 987 831% 1,220 MB/s
Poor: 134% Great: 292%
SABRENT 960GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 154GB free Firmware: 2210 SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 392 394 333 340 272 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 370 Write 422 Mixed 328 SusWrite 355 83% 369 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 48.8 4K Mixed 28.7 96% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 171 127% 168 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 74%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 21,747 User benchmarks, average bench 219% 83GB free Firmware: CXZ74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1442 1453 1437 1438 1448 1442 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	290% Outstanding	Read 1,780 Write 1,314 Mixed 637 SusWrite 1,443 289% 1,294 MB/s	4K Read 50.2 4K Write 164 4K Mixed 65.5 247% 93.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,382 DQ Write 1,096 DQ Mixed 989 808% 1,156 MB/s
Poor: 134% ↑ This bench: 290% Great: 292%
Samsung MZVKW512HMJP 512GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 59GB free Firmware: 0208 SusWrite @10s intervals: 708 706 700 704 718 708 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 83% Great: 84%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 21,747 User benchmarks, average bench 219% 65GB free Firmware: CXZ74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1914 Write 1,320 Mixed 652 285% 1,295 MB/s	4K Read 49.6 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 67.9 252% 96 MB/s	DQ Read 1,502 DQ Write 1,097 DQ Mixed 996 826% 1,198 MB/s
Poor: 134% Great: 292%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	138% Outstanding	MC Read 50 MC Write 75.6 MC Mixed 42.7 160% 56.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 12.5 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	38x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	22x
Core i9-7940XIntel $815Bench 83%, 4,560 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	12x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	9x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 12,020 samples	8x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	8x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	5x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	21x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	17x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $775

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)